Please
read Part 1 of the case before reading this.
After reading full facts of the
case, I realized that the only ‘innocent’ arguments that the abolitionists used
was that the arson evidence was based on flawed science. I now know that these
are only opinions, like new technology challenging the old one. The old
evidence was still valid. If Willingham was alive today and given a retrial, I
am very sure they will find him guilty. Apart from the ‘flawed’ science
argument, other evidence of his behaviour and things found in the house still
prove his guilt.
Some abolitionists blamed his
defense attorney, David Martin for failing to defend him properly. I do not,
not because I know that Martin was speaking the truth but I know that a defense
attorney cannot accept only ‘innocent’ clients as he or she will only starve.
What if Willingham was not executed
but allowed to keep his life? Let us for argument’s sake, assume that
Willingham pleaded guilty and was given life without parole. Will you risk him
murdering another inmate or a prison staff? Bear in mind, he is a dangerous psychopath.
It is hard to believe that abolitionists can portray him as a gentle lamb when
he is so dangerous.
Let us assume that before he was
executed, the courts believed that the original arson evidence was truly flawed
and they released him. Since the abolitionists believe he is innocent, I can
challenge them to allow him to babysit their children. I can also add that he
may murder someone else again, just like Joseph Green Brown or any recidivist murderers.
Please think of the death of the
three children and feel for the mother. To learn more, please go here.
No comments:
Post a Comment